L'extension sur le territoire parisien du plan de caméras de la préfecture a été voté lundi soir par le PS, l'UMP et le Nouveau Centre. Contre les Verts et le PC.
L'extension du plan de vidéosurveillance de la préfecture de police à Paris a été votée lundi soir au conseil de Paris au terme d'un débat long et animé qui s'est conclu par un scrutin électronique.
Après trois heures de séance, la délibération de la mairie autorisant cette extension sur le territoire parisien a été votée par 112 voix pour (PS, UMP et Centre et indépendants) et 16 voix contre (les Verts et le PCF) ainsi que 4 abstentions.
L'exécutif, malgré les protestations du président des Verts, Sylvain Garel, a fait voter un amendement de fusion des 1000 amendements déposés par les Verts, afin d'empêcher que le débat ne s'éternise après que chacun eut exposé son point de vue.
Les Verts, partie prenante de la majorité de gauche au conseil de Paris, considèrent ce texte comme "un piège que la droite tend à la majorité parisienne" et se sont opposés à ce projet "voulu par Hortefeux et Sarkozy".
Le maire PS, Bertrand Delanoë, avait souhaité un débat "serein et honnête", estimant que "l'insécurité est à bien des égards une injustice sociale".
Le préfet de police, Michel Gaudin, a souligné que l'Etat allait "consentir en faveur des Parisiens le plus gros investissement français en matière de vidéoprotection", l'Etat finançant environ 95% de l'investissement et la quasi totalité du fonctionnement.
M. Gaudin a cité une étude de l'inspection générale de l'administration (sur 9 ans de statistiques) selon laquelle "dans les communes qui s'en sont dotées, la délinquance diminue presque deux fois plus vite que dans celles qui n'en ont pas". Un rapport dont les conclusions sont critiquées par les opposants à la vidéosurveillance.
L'investissement est évalué "entre 80 et 100 M EUR" pour un partenariat public-privé, soit sur 15 ans une évaluation à "200-250 MEUR" (investissement et fonctionnement), selon M. Gaudin.
La Ville participera modestement à hauteur de 5 M EUR (subvention d'investissement) à ce plan, alors que le budget annuel municipal des actions de prévention à Paris est de 200 M EUR.
On peut une fois encore se poser la question de savoir ce qu'il advient de l'espace public "surveillé", lorsque celui-ci est surveillé par un partenariat "public-privé" ou même dans certain cas par des entreprises privées auxquelles l'Etat passe commande... Cette portion d'espace surveillée n'est de tout évidence plus un espace public au sens où on pouvait l'entendre jusqu'ici, ce n'est pas non plus un espace privé. Alors, qu'est-ce?
Nokia is reportedly working with Korean developers on a face recognition application for some of its upcoming phones.
This application is designed to identify the faces of the person whose photos you have clicked using your mobile phone. All the user needs to do is to identify the face in his/her album just once. Post that, the application performs a search and identifies all similar looking faces stored on the phone. Apart from the face recognition capabilities, it will also feature time and location based features.
The application will make its debut with phones running Series 60 OS and having at least a 3-megapixel camera.
---
Like Nokia last week, Qualcomm has been talking up the future of phones, and the company gave us a sneak peek of what to expect a short while down the road: face recognition technology tied to social network search technology, so you can find out what a stranger just tweeted simply by pointing your handset at them. Is Facebook stalking about to get a whole lot worse?
We’ve seen in-picture face recognition start to appear in mobile phones recently, with Sony Ericsson promising the tech will make it into the Xperia X10 early next year. But Qualcomm reckons it’s going to get much more integrated and advanced.
Qualcomm Snapdragon tablet concept revealed
Gilbert admitted that the possibility raised serious privacy issues – you could theoretically pull up a person’s home address through automatic whois requests – but ethics aside, it’s an interesting next step for augmented reality apps, which layer data over the surroundings and have started to take off in a big way over the last year. As phones get faster and more powerful, what’s to stop people integrating this form of search?
---
Apple iPhoto
---
Face.com is opening its photo-tagging system, based on facial-recognition technology, to Facebook members.
Face.com
Face.com’s Photo Tagger app uses facial-recognition technology to help Facebook members tag photos of their friends.
Photo Tagger, which launched to a limited group of users in July, scans a user’s photo albums on the social-networking site, then lets him tag faces it identifies. It groups multiple shots of each person, making it easy to tag large albums, and users can also adjust or remove incorrectly tagged pictures.
Once a member has been identified, the app prompts him or her to approve the tag — a crucial privacy step, since he or she may not want to be labeled in a photo. It also works with a member’s current photo-privacy settings on Facebook.
For users with lots of friends and photos, Photo Tagger helps them spread the word and ensure that their contacts see relevant shots on their news feeds, said Gil Hirsch, Face.com’s chief executive.
“If you don’t tag an album, people don’t know about it,” he said. “What we’re doing is basically supporting the existing mechanism and augmenting it.”
The Tel Aviv-based company’s facial-recognition technology specializes in pictures in which the subject isn’t looking at the camera, as well as low-resolution or out-of-focus images, “what we refer to as everyday photos,” Mr. Hirsch said. “All these different things that make photos real.”
Photo Tagger is free, though he said Face.com is considering fee-based services that it could provide over the system. He declined to say what they might be.
Face.com is also introducing a new Photo Tagger feature, dubbed Face Alerts, along with the launch. It allows members to be notified through Facebook or email when new public photos are uploaded of them or their friends. “It’s a Google Alerts for faces,” Mr. Hirsch said, and a way for members to gain more control over where their image appears.
The app has taken off even in its alpha phase — he said more than 35,000 people have tried it. TechCrunch called it a “time vampire” because of its addictive nature, though VentureBeat noted that it might even work too well, and that it could lead to more people tweaking their privacy settings to avoid the limelight.
Mr. Hirsch said the company is sensitive to privacy concerns. “While for some folks face-recognition technology feels a little creepy, we’ve had no complaints or direct issues with the applications,” he added. “In fact, we’ve had quite a few privacy-aware users who tried out our apps, and their feedback was very positive, and with the new Face Alerts feature felt it actually helps them gain control of their online image.”
Personal comment:
A set of articles concerning the same facial detection and recognition schemas. It seems to be available/coming soon on social networks, normal computer applications and mobile phones with bridges from one platform to another.
Pushing this technology to the dark side will make possible to any one of us to be able to obtain the name, the address, or any kind of data about a person we can just see in the street, just by taking a simple picture.
As the technology seems to be planned for huge deployment, people will be able to file/record their own personal/biometric data on any kind of devices/social networks, prior to any possible reaction of legal instances.
Many people who want to read electronic books are discovering that they can do so on the smartphones that are already in their pockets — bringing a whole new meaning to “phone book.” And they like that they can save the $250 to $350 that they would otherwise spend on yet another gadget.
“These e-readers that cost a lot of money only do one thing,” said Keishon Tutt, a 37-year-old pharmacist in Texas who buys 10 to 12 books a month to read on her iPhone, from Apple. “I like to have a multifunctional device. I watch movies and listen to my songs.”
Over the last eight months, Amazon, Barnes & Noble and a range of smaller companies have released book-reading software for the iPhone and other mobile devices. One out of every five new applications introduced for the iPhone last month was a book, according to Flurry, a research firm that studies mobile trends.
New dispatch: “A synchronicity: Design Fictions for Asynchronous Urban Computing” by Julian Bleecker and myself has just been released. It’s a discussion between the two us from the Situated Technologies Pamphlets series, published by the Architectural League. This series aims at exploring the implications of ubiquitous computing for architecture and urbanism: How are our experience of the city and the choices we make in it affected by mobile communications, pervasive media, ambient informatics and other “situated” technologies? How will the ability to design increasingly responsive environments alter the way architects conceive of space? What do architects need to know about urban computing and what do technologists need to know about cities?
Introduced by the editor as:
“In the last five years, the urban computing field has featured an impressive emphasis on the so-called “real-time, database-enabled city” with its synchronized Internet of Things. In Situated Technologies Pamphlets 5, Julian Bleecker and Nicolas Nova argue to invert this common perspective and speculate on the existence of an “asynchronous city.” Through a discussion of objects that blog, they forecast situated technologies based on weak signals that show the importance of time on human practices. They imagine the emergence of truly social technologies that through thoughtful provocation can invert and disrupt common perspective.“
We’d like to thank Omar Khan, Trebor Scholz and Mark Shepard for this great opportunity!
A very recent publication by Nicolas Nova & Julian Bleecker on the Situated technologies Pamphlets serie. Haven't read it yet, looking forward to do so!
This blog is the survey website of fabric | ch - studio for architecture, interaction and research.
We curate and reblog articles, researches, writings, exhibitions and projects that we notice and find interesting during our everyday practice and readings.
Most articles concern the intertwined fields of architecture, territory, art, interaction design, thinking and science. From time to time, we also publish documentation about our own work and research, immersed among these related resources and inspirations.
This website is used by fabric | ch as archive, references and resources. It is shared with all those interested in the same topics as we are, in the hope that they will also find valuable references and content in it.